Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Wand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Philip Wand

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

BLP that has been unsourced since 2006. No significant coverage found. Michig (talk) 10:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BLPPROD. Article does not provide any sources to back up claims of WP:notability.Martin 4 5 1  12:13, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I searched. The claim that he wrote BT-Enfocast which was widely used in the UK could be notable if BT-Enfocast was reviewed (per WP:CREATIVE #3), but unable to find anything. Also searched for ("Philip Wand" "Dear Wandy") but very little has been said about Wand independent of Wand. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 07:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not think being a columnist in a fan-mag or trade rag constitutes notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.