Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippe Buhannic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Philippe Buhannic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Co-founder of a company of marginal notability. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  14:33, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  The   Magnificentist  08:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  03:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article which is essentially a business executive's CV. The paragraph of text claiming the subject's pre-eminence is not adequately supported by the Forbes article about a transaction where a hedge fund selecting the subject's firm's product. Of the other references, the BestExecution item is a Q&A and the wallstreetandtech.com reference is to a site author page, nor does inclusion in a "Trading Technology 40" list appear sufficient for encyclopaedic notability. Aside from a few in-role quotations from the subject in routine announcements, there is May 2016 financial media coverage of events not mentioned in the article text, for example, . I think these can be regarded as WP:BLP1E and are insufficient for personal notability. AllyD (talk) 07:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and AllyD's excellent analysis. Just a CV, searches show nothing to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:56, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.