Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippe Maidenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 11:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Philippe Maidenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable architect with a mostly promotional tone article with few independent sources. Attempt was made to trim the promo tone and add a couple independent sources but article creator and an IP are trying to re-insert unsourced info and put back all promo text. too many primary sources. Does not pass WP:GNG Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant (talk) 20:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:41, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very little evidence of notability. The references are: a directory listing, his own web site, a brief mention, an interview with him, tripadvisor. I don't consider any of these acceptable. Maproom (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as the current article is still questionable for the applicable notability, nothing at all convincing at this time to come close for that. SwisterTwister   talk  21:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.