Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Airlines Flight 113


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Philippine Airlines Flight 113

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTNEWS. Engine fires are not uncommon occurrences. Aviation safety network archives are full of them. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete not only is it WP:NOTNEWS it's not even a notable incident. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: unlike United Airlines Flight 627, there appears to be little to no impact on other flights. If Wikipedia covered every engine fire, we’d never finish that task. It kind of reminds me of a Cracked.com Photoplasty image where a social media user posts every breath in and breath out: I cannot remember what page it was in, though. -- Minoa (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not really noteworthy for a mention in wikipedia never mind a full article, just a bad day at the office that ended well. MilborneOne (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Is there any way we can vet these ridiculous articles before they reach main space?--Petebutt (talk) 14:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Compressor stalls are quite common and trivial (Just 2 months ago there's a CCA flight also getting a compressor stall). Unless the flight has something notable, the incident itself is not notable enough.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Simply not important enough for an encyclopedia article. - Samf4u (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:RUNOFTHEMILL, relativity common aviation occurrence, no injuries and no damage outside the engine itself. Just not notable. - Ahunt (talk) 02:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:DOGBITESMAN, insignificant event; here's another from the same month: Engine Fire Prompts Air India Airbus A321 Diversion zmm (talk) 17:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being a Mabuhay Miles member, I can tell you from firsthand experience that this is a run of the mill incident. Bearian (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - per WP:SNOW, with full respect to its creator, it is clear that this article does not pass above WP:NOTNEWS and that there is a clear consensus to delete. Inter&#38;anthro (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.