Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Prudential Life Insurance Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Philippine Prudential Life Insurance Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Oh god just look at the sources - company website, company website, press release, oh company website. Where's the WP:ORGIND, the WP:CORPDEPTH - fails WP:NCORP. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Or if you wish, WP:AUD. I actually missed over Philippine Prudential Life: Great at 48 source, but I can't even verify that the book exists or is reliable..or barely even the publisher Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:44, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete there's undisclosed use of at least one ref written by the article editor (now marked, and listed at WP:COIN). As such, I have no confidence in the ability to discern what source is what due to lack of disclosure and improper editing. Instead of volunteers investing time, this is really an example of WP:BOGOF where I refuse to spend time investigating and evaluating hidden COIs, leaving only WP:TNT for this promotion. Widefox ; talk 15:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with Widefox and the nominator. Unfixable. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Article fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP, as most of it's sourcing can be traced to the company itself or to passing mentions in press releases. Information exists about the size and scope of the company, by nothing indicates (to me) the encyclopedia value of the present article. In addition, Widefox's point that the article is practically unsalvageable is well made given Noraft's dubious decision to cite himself as a source, which indicates a WP:ORGIND issue.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom and above. References fail WP:NCORP, topic fails GNG.  HighKing++ 12:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence of notability provided or found. (The present article text is also missing significant change - "Insurance Commission places Philippine Prudential under conservatorship", Dec 2016, and subsequent stay order - which would need to be edited into the article were it to be retained.) AllyD (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. --  Dane talk  19:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Created promotionally and fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Note that most of these !voters including me came from the case at WP:COIN. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  06:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.