Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine radio station salt evasions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and mild salting. ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Philippine radio station salt evasions

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)



Two articles on radio stations in the Philippines that were created evading a salt on the unprefixed callsign (DWIP, DWYE), and contain no real evidence of notability. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 9.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete and salt - WP:A7. BrigadierG (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt: The earlier deletions and saltings were as late as 2016, which was still a time of looser, non-GNG inclusion standards in this topic area (a deletion in that era would indicate being especially substandard). While both have been redirects to the list of MBC Media Group stations at various points, that has been contested enough (the most recent ones led to this nomination) that I see no reason why the page histories should be retained any further. While there may still be some value in redirects from these titles, even those should still be accompanied by long-term protection and in addition, not an alternative, to deletion.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  22:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  22:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per nom -- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:25, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Both meet WP:GNG. Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with most of them in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Can we strike off this person's votes here? Seriously, none of the refs offer WP:SIGCOV, and the sole WP:RS in DWIP had the most passing of mentions. The sole WP:RS in DWYE that maybe SIGCOV
 * is behind a pay wall. Delete and salt DWIP, AGF no comment on DWYE. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * is behind a pay wall. Delete and salt DWIP, AGF no comment on DWYE. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:58, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.