Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippos Chatzaridis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   17:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Philippos Chatzaridis
Non-notable person, only claim to notability is that he once accidentally found a prehistoric cave. Nothing else is known about him or will ever be known. Compare similar case, created by same editor, recently deleted here: Articles for deletion/Christos Sariannidis Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:31, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if no other claims to notability can be made, WP:BIO refers.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   05:43, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It'd be worth merging to Petralona Cave except even that doesn't seem to be sufficiently important to merit an article.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  06:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Actually, Petralona Cave would indeed make for a good article (notable excavation site of early humans in Europe), except that it's apparently a bit of a playground for pseudo-scientific fringe scholars, and some editors have been spamming POV-pushing fringy content related to it across multiple articles instead of creating one decent one where it belongs. See Aris Poulianos, for a start. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:12, 20 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat 07:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sufficiently notable. If appropriate, warrants mention in Cave article. —Centrx→talk 21:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enough notable.--Aldux 23:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.