Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philips Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Philips. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Philips Design

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The main article on Philips already contains more quantity and quality of information on products and corporate structuring than this completely unsourced WP:PUFF article. Sources exist, but I don't believe they're enough to justify a separate article under WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. The only coverage I'd call significant (here) describes how product design helped to rejuvenate Philips, which would be more appropriately integrated into the main Philips article. Skeletor3000 (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 16:46, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: From the nomination comments it seems like a merge or redirect might be appropriate here, so relisting rather than moving directly to soft deletion.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Comment No objection whatsoever to the relist (certainly some discussion should take place), but for clarity's sake, the source I mentioned above as a prospect for inclusion into the main Philips article is not currently included in the Philips Design article. Other merge-worthy material is already included in the main Philips article, as far as I can tell. Skeletor3000 (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge whatever is appropriate to the primary Philips topic and then Delete.  HighKing++ 15:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.