Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philips phile

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this  page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus. Tony Sidaway|Talk 21:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Philips phile
NN, of limited notability. RickK 04:19, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, stationcruft. Megan1967 07:49, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to be notable and long-running, has a respectable 8,180 Google hits Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 16:08, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. -- Dcfleck 16:19, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.