Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Kingston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Phillip Kingston

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Paid contribution by   banned sockpuppet of banned editor. The subject has been engaged in a number of enterprises, none noable, and written a book, published by one of his firms  DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Weak keep. Note: Accepted by me during the July backlog drive. Giving it a second quick look leaning towards weak keep as pass of WP:BASIC, quick search found a new coverage (negative press that should probably be integrated in the existing article if kept): https://www.afr.com/rear-window/sargon-founder-phillip-kingston-fights-27m-lawsuit-20210922-p58tw0 nearlyevil  665  06:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Very Weak Keep Agree with above, should be re-written to include the negative press. Oaktree b (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per reliable notability establishing source found by nearlyevil above. Fieari (talk) 07:48, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There is a bit to be found, a bit more than just mentions and routine, and there are multiple events over time, but not really solid.  Article does need some balance.  Aoziwe (talk) 09:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.