Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Miller


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Phillip Miller

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:MMANOT criteria for only having 2 fights in top tier promotions. While retiring undefeated is a rare sight, subject doesn't have an extraordinary coverage by sources, failing WP:GNG.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 03:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:08, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Strictly speaking, he doesn't meet WP:NMMA. It seems he left the UFC in a money dispute in 2002, before the UFC became such a big money operation. My search found a good number of ghits, but less than I'd hoped in the significant independent coverage category.  I found him mentioned in routine sports reporting, various MMA forums/chatrooms, and even an interview where he said he quit because while he was badly beating a fighter in some small promotion, he realized that one day that it would be him on the receiving end--especially because he could never see himself quitting after a loss.  I'd like to ignore all rules and vote to keep the article, but I can't get past him not meeting WP:GNG or some SNG.  I'll admit I'm open to a good argument as to why this article should be kept.  Right now all I've got is WP:ILIKEIT. Papaursa (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Papaursa.4meter4 (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.