Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Scott Bell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Phillip Scott Bell

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I can't find any biographical coverage. There's a couple credits listed out there, but absent any secondary source coverage, we can't ever have a verifiable article. Gigs (talk) 12:44, 26 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as non-notable and a possible WP:BLP problem. I have serious doubts that a person employed at the famous J. Walter Thompson advertising firm would write a page about himself on Wikipedia, let alone an article that implies that he has been associated with only one ad campaign.  If we have an article about the ad campaign for Swedish Fish, I suppose that the many JWT persons on the team can have their names mentioned.  I suspect, but can't prove, that this lone contribution from User:ScottBell5050 is a case of someone finding a person with the same name.  Mandsford (talk) 17:45, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete because of not many reliable sources (if any at all). I don't think it's that notable to have an article. -- B s a d o w s k i 1   05:14, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.