Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Thomas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Phillip Thomas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:N. Although there are many sources listed for this article, Thomas does not appear to have significant coverage.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:13, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete While there are sources here, most of them are not reliable, and those that are mention the subject in passing, rather than him being the focus of the articles. Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. When reading through the flurry, it is someone selling his services as a ghostwriter and purveyor of baclofen. JFW &#124; T@lk  21:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass WP:SCHOLAR; Google Scholar search under several variations of his name finds nothing, and his bibliography in the article is unremarkable. He is occasionally quoted in the media but I found no significant coverage ABOUT him so he does not pass WP:BIO. --MelanieN (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.