Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philmont Leadership Challenge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Owen&times; &#9742;  21:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Philmont Leadership Challenge

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:GNG, WP:NOTGUIDE WP:ADVERT. This is more of a flyer than encyclopedic article and it's evident by contents like "During 2012, the program fee was $470 if paid before January 2012, or $495 after January 1. This fee includes all meals and lodging, training materials, and a course patch. " Graywalls (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Scouting, Products,  and Texas. Graywalls (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep and wikify Content is useful but should be updated. --evrik (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment thanks for you opinion, but please name three independendent reliable sources with significant depth of coverage specifically on this topic to indicate this warrants a stand-alone article. Factual verifiability is not equivalent to notability. Graywalls (talk) 22:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * , I don't know what you mean with "wikify". Drmies (talk) 20:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I was wondering that too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Perhaps it could be merged into Philmont Scout Ranch, but the material does need to be cut back and generally improved. Bduke (talk)
 * I think it was "forked" out of that article in the first place. --evrik (talk) 17:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Products. Graywalls (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * This is purely organizational material, lacking any secondary sourcing--nor should we expect any. I wouldn't call this article an ad, but the effect of this plethora of organizational articles, in-universe articles as it were without any secondary sourcing, is a walled garden for such articles to lean on each other, and that certainly has promotional effects. Delete. Drmies (talk) 20:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - The sourcing on the page is not independent. A search online didn't find anything in-depth that could satisfy WP:GNG. Would recommend a redirect to Boy Scouts of America as an WP:ATD.--CNMall41 (talk) 03:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not a notable encyclopaedic subject. I believe this one is covered by WP:NORG. There is no sourcing per WP:SIRS demonstrating notability. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.