Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philmont Scout Ranch camps


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. (Non admin closure). Qst 22:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Philmont Scout Ranch camps

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability. jj137 ( Talk ) 02:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 as non-notable group, no notability asserted, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable part of the scout ranch, apparently a necessary branch of the main article. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment You also forgot to put the AfD tag on the article. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as most of this information is well-documented at Philmont Scout Ranch, which is indeed notable. The camps themselves are not notable, except as components of Philmont itself. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 05:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * strong keep, well done list, one of the best I've seen, as lists go, notability shown at parent article, this is simply an adjunct to that article. Chris (talk) 08:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep These camps are notable in total as part of Philmont. This article was deliberately created by merging a number of individual camp articles that were just stubs and by moving the list of camps from the main article.  Since this material was split, it is *not* documented in Philmont Scout Ranch.  The article needs a lot of work, especially sources, but is not irredeemable.  --—  Gadget850 (Ed)  talk  -  12:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, see Chris and Gadget850-Phips (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gadget850. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 13:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gadget850. --evrik (talk) 14:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gadget850 (who said it so much better than I could). - Dravecky (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.