Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophical Frontiers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 11:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Philosophical Frontiers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable journal; still unsourced (save to itself) after five years. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The only material I am finding about the journal are 2008-10 postings relating to submitting to it. That is insufficient to establish the journal as being/having been notable, added to which its site now appears to have gone offline. AllyD (talk) 19:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Like AllyD, I cannot find any evidence of notability or even that it still exists. --Randykitty (talk) 12:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Terrible linkrot. Also, judging by this, it violated WP:PROMOTION even before the journal fell off the face of the earth (or at least the internet). Lord   Bromblemore  13:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.