Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy in literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Ingoolemo talk 06:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Philosophy in literature
Subjective (POV) list with no justification for inclusion of entries.
 * Delete per nomination. --DannyWilde 05:18, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has been extensively rewritten and should not now be deleted. Thank you to the author of the current article. --DannyWilde 07:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I am sure that an interesting article could be written on this topic. However, this isn't it. I would vote to keep even a decent stub on this topic but for now delete. Capitalistroadster 05:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete arbitrary list. Looks like the reading for an undergraduate lecture course. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 18:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. May try to flesh this out.  I cannot say that this list will be useless to someone who wishes to write a more extended article.  I may add some stubbly bits.  Smerdis of Tlön 17:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I have endeavoured to write some off the cuff text to surround the list. Needs a lot of work, though.  Smerdis of Tlön 17:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * That's amazing for 22 minutes! Bravo! Now Strong Keep.
 * Keep/redirect/something WP needs an article on this; though this list is fairly bad, it is a good faith effort, and belongs in the history of the eventual topic.  If nothing else, redirect to philosophy itself. Xoloz 17:54, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.