Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy of life


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not only were there no cogent arguments made in favour of deletion, but the nomination itself veers close to WP:SKCRIT #1. (non-admin closure)  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 17:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Philosophy of life

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This should be deleted and turned into a redirect to philosophy. the content is really just a dictionary definition, followed by a link to a related term, and a very poor attempt at original research on how to group various philosophies. philosophy IS about "philosophy of life". its really just a convenient catch phrase, after which one describes ones personal philosophy, usually an aphorism or 2. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 06:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 07:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Strong keep - this is an informative article that is too specific to be merged with the general article on philosophy. It contains too much information to be written off as a dictionary definition. Vorbee (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep. "Delete and redirect to X" is only appropriate when there's something fundamentally problematic with the current content, so problematic that it needs to be hidden.  You're free to redirect it yourself without an AFD.  Moreover, I agree with Vorbee that it shouldn't be redirected to Philosophy because that's more general, but the topic seems closer to worldview, and again there's no reason to delete something if it could be a plausible redirect to another article.  I have no opinion on whether we should keep this as an article or convert it into a redirect.  Nyttend (talk) 04:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.