Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phirki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I can't see the benefit of retaining this for another relist. No consensus in opinions if this subject meets GNG. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Phirki

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Television series that does not pass WP:NMEDIA. Coverage is of routine events. 1292simon (talk) 08:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. 1292simon (talk) 08:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  10:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS / WP:IS including Times of India and Anand Bazar. Hence meets WP:GNG. Also meets WP:TVSERIES since Zee Bangla has weekly reach of 900 million. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ad Meliora (talk • contribs) 13:53, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, could have been G5'd, since it was created by a sock of a banned user, Rakhi Das. Onel 5969  TT me 02:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: WP:NTV says "Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television channel with a broad regional or national audience." Phirki is on a national broadcast network. There is reliable source coverage from Times of India and Asianet News. The original creator being a banned user is irrelevant; article notability is determined by the notability of the topic. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * times of India is not an RS anymore. It can be used as a supporting source, but not to establish notability. —usernamekiran (talk) 05:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pamzeis (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 23:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG Balle010 (talk) 01:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete From my look over of this, it seems as though it comes down to two sources Times of India and Asianet News. Since Times of India can't be used for notability, then all that's left is Asianet News, but there needs to be "multiple" in-depth reliable sources. Number of viewers, being on a national network etc. etc. Isn't a guarantee of notability either. Which is why the guideline says they are "generally" and "likely" indicators of notability, not "always" ones. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete there is not sufficient in-depth reputable coverage. --Ysangkok (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.