Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe Dahl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 11:21, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Phoebe Dahl

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG - Inherited Notability from grandparents. The information in this stub could be added to the articles of her grandparents (if reliably sourced). Does not merit an individual Wikipedia entry. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve Wading through the torrent of tabloid gossip online about her personal life and family (try searching on "Phoebe Dahl" -ruby), she does have reasonable coverage in WP:RS as a fashion designer and activist, e.g., , , etc. Wikishovel (talk) 18:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete does not pass the notability requirements for fashion designers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment there's an evident WP:COI for the two WP:SPAs who created the article. They've both been busy today adding marketing crap to the article, and repeatedly removing maintenance templates. User:feebeegeebee123 might well be the subject of the article. I think she meets WP:BASIC as I noted above, and have tried to improve the article a bit, but no good deed goes unpunished it seems. Wikishovel (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

*Keep and improve* Notability for her achievements. The information in this stub can not be added to the articles of her grandparents for having enough personal references and been linked from other pages. feebeegeebee123 (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

*Keep it does have enough notability to be listed as a fashion designer and articles online suggest it is a known name for the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kate562 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC) ::

Collapsed and struck !votes from confirmed sockpuppets of Article's creator. Exemplo347 (talk) 10:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — MRD2014 (talk • contribs) 16:53, 5 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It appears that the subject is probably notable, per the sources identified above and some of the others found by a Google News search amongst all of the tabloid tittle-tattle, but, in sympathy with 's final words above, I'm buggered if I'm going to help with this when there are people trying to make it into an advertisement rather than an encyclopedia article. Those editors who are trying to do that would be well-advised to simply stop and let someone else write this. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.