Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe English


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Phoebe English

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not enough RS. It also fails to pass WP:GNG FossLimi (talk) 13:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I call BS! Forbes 30 Under 30 is enough to establish notability! Stop wasting my time with spurious RFDs. (Heroeswithmetaphors)   talk  14:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article should be improved and lengthened, not deleted. As the other user said, Forbes 30 Under 30 is enough to establish notability. Seungri400 (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * not sure if Forbes 30 under 30 is enough notability. Where did you get it? --FossLimi (talk) 15:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - Seems to be well covered in the fashion news, and received a 2021 honor of 'Leaders of Change' award from the British Fashion Council   . I added some of these to the article. DaffodilOcean (talk) 17:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * evident problems with WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. What are the three best references that clearly connote notability per the mentioned guidelines? --FossLimi (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * She meets WP:ARTIST criteria #4d ("been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums"). She has received recognition for her creative work (see citations in awards section of page). DaffodilOcean (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment, any notable museums/galleries holding her work? Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, she has four pieces in the Victoria and Albert Museum. Citations in the text. DaffodilOcean (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks, this is a clear keep as meeting WP:ARTIST with works in permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums, article now reflects this. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep ...and following up to my comments (and additions to the page), I vote keep. She meets WP:ARTIST with pieces in the permanent collection of two museums. DaffodilOcean (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * hi, you have already recommended "keep" once before, would you like to change this to a "comment"? Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, sorry, this is my inexperience with this process. I now realize I mangled where my comments and votes should go. DaffodilOcean (talk) 14:17, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.