Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:02, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Phoebe Price

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability. Almost orphaned. Little useful information on page. I think articles like this are still being created by people simply to link to self-promotional sites because they don't understand about nofollow. Centrepull (talk) 03:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as the subject doesn't appear to pass WP:ENT or WP:BIO. Most notable achievements seem to be having minor film roles, which doesn't really pass our notability criterion. Also, this nomination was initially incomplete, it should now be fixed -- B figura (talk) 03:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Same as above.--  fetch  comms  ☛ 04:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as while subject has received some significant coverage in widely-read reliable third-party coverage, the Los Angeles Times article refers to her as a "sub-lebrity" and a "D-lister" known mostly for appearing on red carpets and at gala openings. Thus her claim to notability stems, ironically, from her utter lack of notability. Also, subject doesn't appear to pass WP:ENT. - Dravecky (talk) 07:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd just add that the LATimes coverage seems to be from a fashion blog subsection of the paper. So I'm not really sure it would be considered significant coverage in widely-read reliable third-party coverage. Either way though, doesn't look like notability is there. -- B figura (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Of course keep, major role in noted The Junkyard Willie Movie: Lost in Transit. 94.193.109.106 (talk) 23:35, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't find any commentary on her role in the movie, although it does appear to be a non-notable direct-to-dvd release. -- B figura (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.