Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix14news


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Good work all round Fritzpoll (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Phoenix14news

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a non-notable student news organization. Google search only turned up primary sources and Facebook page. No coverage in reliable secondary sources, failing WP:N KuyaBriBri Talk 20:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. There is a lot of notability that the article claims, but the only sources are those connected with the subject itself. TheLetterM (talk) 21:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per extensive revisions to the page. TheLetterM (talk) 01:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, nonnotable tv show at a single college. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable and doubt that it will ever be.  Ceran  llama chat post 21:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Excellent work by Michael.  Ceran  llama chat post 19:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable student produced public access show from a small college. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 21:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. Tiptoety  talk 21:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't a redirect and mention in Elon University be appropriate? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  22:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The page title is not a likely search term. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 03:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, if someone was looking for information on this news organization, the page title would be a highly likely search term. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  05:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: trivial coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note – The above user has been blocked for sockpuppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — KuyaBriBri Talk 14:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 *  Trim and Merge  to Elon University. Plenty of NN content here, but the organization clearly exists and merits a bit of coverage there. Jclemens (talk) 19:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements. I should have had more faith... :-) Jclemens (talk) 02:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep now that I have trimmed the extraneous fluff and sourced the awards. Needs additional sources, but its looking much better.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * All in the proper research. I have just upped my keep from "weak" to "strong" based upon aditional awards just found and added to the article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per Schmidt and recent changes to article. Strong notability demonstrated. Toddst1 (talk) 04:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note An anonymous SPA IP, quite possibly the IP of the blocked author, just tried re-adding all the unsourced kruft I had removed diff. I reverted to my last version and politely left a note on the IP's talk page diff, as well as the talk page of the blocked author diff, explaining that the additional information could not remain as being both unencyclopedic and unsourced.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I would like to withdraw this nomination and applaud the efforts of those who improved the article. I do understand, however, that since there are still a couple of outstanding delete !votes this can't be speedy kept. KuyaBriBri Talk 19:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.