Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix (music producer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Phoenix (music producer)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet the general notability guideline. There are several claims made in the article, but sourced to a blog. Significant third party reliable sources are lacking. ~YellowFives 07:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 13:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Count this a keep from User:TSKREO, the primary author of the article. TSKREO left me this message at my talk page, and I am relaying it here because it may be informative to other editors:
 * "I will make adjustments to this page. However the champ magazine site is not only a blog, but also a radio show in Toronto, Canada. The interview was a transcribed on the site. I will delete the material referencing Champ magazine. However the youtube account and link are official and the material on that account are distributed by rapper 50 cent. Also the wikipedia page for 50 cent's album Before I Self Destruct overtly credits Phoenix as the producer of the track Flight 187. The material regarding Phoenix and his linkage as the producer of that song is supported and has valid sources, right?"
 * This was the version of the article that had the Champ Magazine references he is talking about. My reply to him: "I will offer my opinion that if you can show which radio station runs the Champ blog, then the Champ blog may be a good source to keep in the article." ~YellowFives 02:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:25, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * delete - no independent verificaztion of natobality. Twri (talk) 02:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.