Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoenix School of Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. TerriersFan (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Phoenix School of Law

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

no sources; non-notable  —Chris Capoccia  T&#8260;C 15:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of coverage available of this school in a simple google search for its name.   etc. JulesH (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable, but definitely needs to be rewritten so as not to sound like an advert. KuyaBriBri Talk 15:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Definitely notable, but agree on the need for a rewrite. I'll give it a shot. §FreeRangeFrog 19:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. All the statistics need to be sourced, and the page needs some clean up.  Other than that, I'd say accredited law schools are quite notable.  Chicken Wing (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. IMO the answer to the criticism "page written like advertisement, doesn't have sufficient references" is "fix the page," not "delete the page." — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielM (talk • contribs)
 * Keep as easily sourcable. Tavix (talk) 22:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Added External links:Official site, + ref for 97% pass bar exam ratio. I believe 97% is very good, this school is very notable. --Mr Accountable (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep In the last few days, the article has gone from zero sources and an unestablished notability to having some decent sources. The article could still be improved and definitely needs more third-party sources, but should stay. Is there a way to rescind a deletion nomination? —Chris Capoccia  T&#8260;C 09:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.