Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pholosong Hospital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 22:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Pholosong Hospital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article only says where the hospital is located and what areas it serves. I couldn't find any significant coverage on top of that. SL93 (talk) 23:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  00:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Tsakane. The standard GNews search shows plenty of passing mentions in reliable sources - enough to make it a reasonable search term amd to justify a mention in the article on its locality, even if none of them justify a standalone article on the topic. PWilkinson (talk) 13:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - I managed to find a few things from the Government itself (like this and this) and though they are not particularly independent (being government sources about a government hospital) they provide plenty of primary source facts that could be added to the article to expand it a bit. On independent coverage of the hospital itself, there are bits and pieces like this and lots of passing mentions to various people associated with various news stories being taken there after accidents and incidents. At the end of the day, this looks to be a fairly big hospital that has been around for a while that takes in 20,000+ admissions and 115,000+ A+E patients a year and is responsible for around 5000 births annually. Seems like a significant medical facility to me. As a comparison, Sydney's Royal North Shore Hospital has around the same number of admissions, Houston's Ben Taub General Hospital sees slightly fewer emergency patients and New England's largest hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, delivers around 3,500 babies annually. Stalwart 111  07:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  03:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Clearly a major, notable, hospital per Stalwart's stalwart research. Phil Bridger (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - per the thorough examination done by Stalwart111. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  20:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.