Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phonemetra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Keep" opinions discounted for what I hope are obvious reasons.  Sandstein  09:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Phonemetra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NCORP. The only references I find are Facebook, PlayStore, some blogs and their web site. J bh Talk  13:29, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 13:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.    Mr RD     16:18, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.    Mr RD     16:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep It can be useful.Peter39c (talk) 23:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.15.122.114 (talk) 21:27, 17 October 2015‎ (UTC) — Peter39c (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * But where is the better coverage as my searches instantly found none? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 05:19, 18 October 2015‎ (UTC)
 * WP:USEFUL is not an argument. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I simply found nothing to suggest better here. Pinging tagger . SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Couldn't find the coverage required to satisfy WP:GNG. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 09:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This is an article that might useful if completed with more references. Jeykey21 (talk) 15:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.54.123.130 (talk)  — Jeykey21 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note - There is no such account as registered at this time.  J bh  Talk  19:07, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:USEFUL is not an argument. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: searches suggest that significant coverage in independent, reliable sources sufficient to meet the general notability guideline are not found. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I decided to help expand this article and find sources notables. Peter39c (talk) 21:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.