Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phonetic pattern

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:58, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Phonetic pattern
This was tagged as speedy, but is not a CSD candidate. Delete as original research or essay. jni 09:29, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete as patent nonsense. It bears no relationship to linguistic theory. --Angr 09:35, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. One of four, um, pieces of writing posted by this IP in the space of an hour, and the first contributions from this IP. They are all on aspects of linguistics and I'm afraid I can't find any useful content in any of it. Two were edits to existing articles and have been reverted, the other two were new articles and this is one of them. I'll write a greeting to the author when I feel stronger. Andrewa 12:52, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: But see Votes for deletion/Linguistic law for an IMO accurate and far more sympathetic response to these contributions. No change of vote. Andrewa 20:27, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research at best, nonsense at worst. JoaoRicardo 00:41, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. --Deathphoenix 04:34, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this nonsense. Josh Cherry 01:16, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research of the "ignorant of existing theory" variety.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 22:59, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.