Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoseon Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Phoseon Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can see that all this subject's sources come from one local newspaper. I looked on Google and the listed sources are just blogs and trade press. Therefore, this medium-sized manufacturing organization fails Notability (organizations and companies) BigheadBigheadBighead (talk) 18:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Oregon.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - as initial author, and I just updated it for the first time in a decade, there is substantial coverage in independent sources. None are the local paper (this company is in Hillsboro and the then local paper was the Hillsboro Argus). The PBJ and Oregonian are regional papers, and there are journals and other publications covering the company or its technologies. This is not a company on the scale of Apple, but we don't require that. May need some clean up from what appears to be COI edits over the last decade though. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep – Good coverage from editorial staff from editions of the American City Business Journals. TLA  (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.