Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhotoDisc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. per the added sources (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

PhotoDisc

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't appear to a company of any particular note. neon white talk 11:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added a reference. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The Business week article seems ok but it needs more to pass notability. -- neon white talk 08:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Added links to a couple more newspaper articles about the company, which combined with Eastmain's BusinessWeek source is enough for me. Gr1st (talk) 21:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.