Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhotoshopContest.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as SPEEDY DELETE, recreation of previously deleted material in violation of WP:SD. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk)  15:02, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

PhotoshopContest.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:WEB.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 14:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY DELETE: tagged for speedy delete: article is recreation of previously deleted material in violation of WP:SD. Mh29255 (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, volkswes 5/30/08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Volkswes (talk • contribs) 13:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * volkswes: Ok I now understand the deletion under the "recreation of deleted material" rule, but I am trying to learn why this website doesn't meet the criteria. I read that the site does not meet Notability. I have articles and sources I can quote where this site is mentions in numerous magazines, radio, and television broadcasts. This site has been around since 2001, one year longer than Worth1000, but yet worth1000 gets an article. Also the site offers wonderful free tutorials and sources to anyone. So maybe it's not the commercial money making site that worth1000 is, but it is equally notable. I appreciate any help you can provide or extra information on how photoshopcontest.com can meet the criteria....or if it will be impossible no matter what is included.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.