Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phrases of North Korean Rhetoric


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 05:30, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Phrases of North Korean Rhetoric

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a collection of quotes from North Korean propaganda, presented in a non-neutral manner. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If this belongs anywhere it is on WikiQuote, and I don't think it even meets their inclusion criteria, so I'd recommend outright deletion.  W.  D.   Graham  21:44, 12 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:NOT It's a Fox! (What did I break) 22:33, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not encyclopedic, soapboxing (aren't those North Koreans wacky?) and at least some of it is referenced to unreliable sources.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  01:05, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. May as well kill it. It's nothing but a collection of quotes and it has no place here. Ducknish (talk) 01:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete It looks like somebody's research notes rather than an encyclopedic article. As the essay Quotations says list of quotes are not appropriate content. It might even be argued that this is a breach of copyright, since it simply reproduces other people's words without enough comment to establish fair use. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom it isn't WP:NPOV and is a collection of quotes. DavidTTTaylor (talk) 17:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.