Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phreesia (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star  Mississippi  02:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Phreesia
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Advert, no WP:NCOPR nor WP:GNG Bash7oven (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: I'm relisting this discussion even though there is an apparent consensus to Delete based on the recent, clear previous decision to "Keep" this article and the relative newness of the editors participating here so far. I'd like to see some veteran AFD folks offer their opinion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete- is not notable yet.WikiDidi99 (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and North Carolina. Shellwood (talk) 19:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment This is listed.   scope_creep Talk  21:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per no independent and reliable coverage --Morpho achilles (talk) 06:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * @User:Bash7oven, What is NCOPR? Jacona (talk) 13:37, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Jacona, I believe he meant WP:CORP. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment A not so glowing review in WaPo here and on NPR here:, I think it's GNG. not the best coverage of the company. More than enough mentions in GScholar for the company, we'd have to really do a deep dive to find a piece there to use as a source.  Oaktree b (talk) 23:06, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly both the WaPo article mentioned above, this case study by HBS and this SWOT Analysis created in conjuction with Havard Business Review appear to meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 18:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.