Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phuq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:00, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Phuq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 19:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  czar  19:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and then Redirect to P.H.U.Q. (as an applicable search) as none of this is imaginably better for the notability.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of anything notable relating to the subject. Will211  |Chatter  00:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, but don't created a redirect. Typing phuq in the search box brings up PHUQ, which already redirects to P.H.U.Q., so a duplicate redirect isn't necesary. This is just about impossible to search for, because of the obvious phonetic connection to fuck, but I tried quite a few combinations and couldn't find anything beyond listings at music sites like Soundcloud and mirrors of this article. But I would say do it without prejudice against a recreation if someone knows of good sources that we just can't properly search for. —Torchiest talkedits 01:59, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.