Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics and Star Trek (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 01:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Physics and Star Trek
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Trivia and fancruft. Metrackle 07:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Highly notable commentary on a significant cultural artifact, as can be seen by the large number of published works on the subject listed in the article.  Nominator does not cite any valid reason to delete the article. JulesH 09:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Nominator has not bothered to construct a decent argument for deletion and has added absolutely nothing to the debate from the last AfD that ended with a keep. Irishjp 10:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per my general belief that things which are the primary subject of an entire published book (in this case, The Physics of Star Trek) are virtually always notable and verifiable enough for an article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep no valid argument offered for deletion, certainly nothing new from the last discussion. --JayHenry 15:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * And can I add IDONTLIKEIT &mdash; I mean I really dislike Star Wars and Star Trek and Pokemon and Manga.   I really wish people had other priorities, like subjects that are less focused on celebrities and popular entertainment.  But does my dislike for "fancruft," whatever that means exactly, make it unworthy? --JayHenry 15:21, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No, because I'm indifferent to Star Trek as a whole.Metrackle 16:06, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Also the subject of at least one documentary on the history channel. FrozenPurpleCube 17:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - notable.  Onnaghar  (Talk) 18:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  19:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as being notable. Yes, I am a fan of Star Trek admittedly however I'm not letting that make my vote biased. (I've not always voted "keep" with topics I'm a fan of.) -WarthogDemon 22:47, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, only keep votes so far... well sourced, had previous afd's, no good argument for deletion, etc... Mathmo Talk 00:59, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.