Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physioalphabet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:14, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Physioalphabet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There appears to have been little uptake of this innovation, or at least nothing that has resulted in substantial third-party coverage; all I can find is mentions on forums (Reddit, StackExchange), wiki aggregators, and the primary website. Nothing in the scientific literature. Fails WP:GNG. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Single Primary source only lacking significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Otr500 (talk) 09:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: there are various links to this, as an example of a Featural writing system. The main site for the script [www.physioalphabet.com] is dead, but images from it illustrating the characters remain in google.  DGG ( talk ) 00:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 23:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This might suggest a possible application of WP:PAGEDECIDE - useful as a separate page even though formally notability is not established yet. I could support that. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:26, 9 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - While a PAGEDECIDE application and the creation of a permanent stub is an option, if we don't have sources to establish notability now, when would we? This was done in 1994; it's not something that's currently ongoing.  As it stands, we don't have it now, and I'm not finding any reliable secondary sources in a WP:BEFORE search.   Red Phoenix  talk  13:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.