Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia (mythology)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 17:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Pia (mythology)
This was one of the 50+ Polynesian mythology articles submitted in a big batch (see Articles for deletion/Ahoeitu). After much discussion at that afd, I'm re-submitting all of the items individually. Some of them may be keepers, most of them will be deletable. I'm deferring to editors such as User:Kahuroa and User:Bucketsofg who have been looking onto these articles as to which is which. Grutness...wha?  02:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverified and (it seems) nonsensical. Bucketsofg 04:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Kahuroa 11:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Verify and Keep If this can be verified, why delete? Its this kind on information thats supposed to make Wikipedia better than a paper encyclopedia.  I do not believe NOM has made a case for deletion with this individual listing. Roodog2k 14:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * comment. The point, Roodog, is that after several days of looking, none of us have been able to find anything to verify the entry.  (See the talk page of the entry for a guess or two about what's gone wrong.  One way or the other, it seems that this term is two or three removes from something) Bucketsofg 21:26, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete because it can't be verified. We went over this at the batch listing.--Cúchullain t c 16:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: I'm assuming verification was attempted in english.  Will strikethrough my vote if it can be shown that attempts were made to verify in the native language.  --MateoP 21:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * comment. See my comment on the discussion page of the article Talk: Pia (mythology) regarding its verifiability in the 'native' language. I am Māori. Kahuroa 22:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. I am trusting Kahuroa on this one. Crypticfirefly 03:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.