Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia Silva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Pia Silva

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent, reliable sources. Sources are Forbes "Contributors" and the subject herself. Vexations (talk) 23:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 00:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

*Delete - The one independent reference does not even contain the name Pia Silva. The others are created by the topic/person herself/himself/neutral object pronoun. Delete per nomination. Barbara ✐ ✉  01:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete another in a long line of articles on non-notable businesspeople in positions like "brand stretegist". Wikipedia is meant to have articles on people who are notable, not to be a way for people to propel themselves to notability. Despite what some think, Wikipedia is not meant to be used like Linkedin. I am totally serious in my statement, I have a friend who thought Wikipedia could properly be used to advance someone's job search.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:32, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree there is no evidence that she meets the notability guidelines. Million_Moments (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.