Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pia Z. Ehrhardt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe )³&#xF0F6; 22:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Pia Z. Ehrhardt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable writer. No independent references, only interviews. No in-depth coverage found on Google search. Not every writer is notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I added a NYT book review to the references. Her work has been critically reviewed in at least one reliable source. Mduvekot (talk) 03:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:55, 6 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Hmlarson (talk) 05:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep I fail to see why interviews are not independent sources, as clearly they demonstrate notability in the fact that a publication wants to use their space for a interview with the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egaoblai (talk • contribs) 05:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.