Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piasetzki & Nenniger LLP

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash 23:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Piasetzki & Nenniger LLP
VfD not previously listed - no vote--Doc (?) 20:34, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Delete. This is a boutique firm of only 5 lawyers and does not seem to have done anything particularly notable. It advertises its work in the case of FWS Joint Sports Claimants v. Border Broadcasters Inc. which isn't a very notable case in and of itself. Moreover, their website misleadingly refer to it as a Supreme Court case when in fact it was denied leave to appeal, so I'm very suspicious. --PullUpYourSocks 21:45, 10 August 2005 (UTC) --J2000ca 06:09, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and Expand on FWS Joint Sports Claimants Not vanity focuses more on FWS Joint Sports Claimants
 * Shouldn't be judged on size only whether they are of encyclopidic value
 * Don't see misleadingly refers to it as a supreme court case, only where they appeared as Counsel(Google).
 * Expand on the FWS Joint Sports Claimants and how they relate to Bill C-60
 * Delete, nn law firm. Zoe 23:06, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not appear to be notable. -- DS1953 01:17, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete generic law firm. Mindmatrix 14:21, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --[[Image:Ottawa flag.png|20px]] Spinboy 19:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.