Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picad media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Picad media

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable advertsing firm, speedy removed by IP Wuh  Wuz  Dat  19:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The references given support the notion that the company exist, but they do not provide the significant coverage required by WP:N, nor can I find any in reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 19:36, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything already said, not notable. a little   insignificant  20:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, obvious advertising for an advertising firm. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources to establish ntoability for this agency -- Whpq (talk) 12:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.