Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piccing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Piccing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. Sources are typical PR sites. Dennis Brown &#124; 2¢ &#124; WER  15:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - should have A7'd it. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Purely non-notable. No sources other than self-promotional sites like and  A.Minkowiski_Lets t@lk 15:22, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The references seems to be self written. Nothing notable at all. Ascii0054 (talk) 08:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This would qualify under both A7 and G11. ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ 話 ♪  ߷  ♀ 投稿 ♀ 06:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.