Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pich Seiha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Pich Seiha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article with no significant or independent coverage about a non-notable fighter. His record as shown as 2 wins and 1 loss as a kickboxer and he lost his only MMA fight via armbar. Fails all notability criteria.Mdtemp (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:34, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nominator.  Fails WP:KICK, WP:MMANOT and WP:GNG.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails to surpass minimum requirements of notability. Longevitydude (talk) 00:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of significant coverage. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * keepNational champ in his home nation. Recognized internationally in a number of sources.  CrazyAces489 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * None of the coverage is significant enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a lack of supporting evidence to show he meets any relevant notability criteria--GNG, martial artists, kickboxers, or MMA fighters. Papaursa (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.