Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PickupAlpha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

PickupAlpha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I feel that this company does not meet WP:NCORP. The Yahoo! article is promotional and reads like a press release and looks like one. Besides, the coverage is not sufficient enough to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. The other references used are all primary sources and, therefore, fail to establish notability.

I could not find any in-depth coverage or analysis of this company in my WP:BEFORE search. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete All I saw in a search was an nyweekly.com item, which I can't show here as it triggers the spam blacklist. NCORP fail. --- Possibly &#9742; 23:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No evidence at all of significant coverage if you discount the Yahoo! article that does, indeed, appear to be a pure promotional piece. Searches return nothing that would demonstrate sufficient notability and the article is a piece of paid editing purely intended to promote the company. DocFreeman24 (talk) 02:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.-KH-1 (talk) 02:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Advice needed - Please advise me as to what is needed for this company to pass Wikipedia's standards. Like how much notability is acceptable etc. Need this for future reference as well. Thanks :) -Abracadabra4201 (talk) 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NCORP very carefully especially the guidance on independent content found at WP:ORGIND Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.