Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pictorial push pull signs for doors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Pictorial push pull signs for doors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was created by the creator of the signs shown. It doesn't appear that this topic is sufficiently notable to merit it's own article per WP:GNG, with only some low-quality sources noting their creation in 2011 and an extremely niche source noting that they had changed colour in 2015. There are of course many alternatives pictorial push/pull signs, but they don't appear to have garnered any attention. SmartSE (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is way too niche for its own article (and I can't imagine anyone searching this term....) and the links seem promotional (there are links to patents that are likely owned by the article creator).Citing (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Very interesting, although my interest is somewhat diminished by the fact that it looks like this is intended to be about specific signs which were designed by the creator of the article (as per the file description). The first external link makes me wonder if there's a bigger topic of "door pushing and pulling" or something... &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Just no. Article created by the inventor or the signs. If anything this might merit one sentence in an article that has to do with ADA signage... but probably not. Also, who GAF? End of deletion reasoning. Side note, while looking for sources I found this gem in a text: "For example, every day millions of people use the common push/pull door signs as they enter and exit stores, factories, and office buildings. Some doors need to be pushed, others pulled."ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep/merge The topic is notable as the page contains plenty of sources and there are more to find such as this. The worst case would be merger into a more general article such as door or signage. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable topic for the encyclopedia, likely created to promote the designer. Netherzone (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - While there may be some merit in discussing the overall concept of these types of signs somewhere, this particular article was made only to cover/promote one specific, non-notable example of them. Thus, there is nothing to merge and, as stated, the term used as the title is unlikely to be a useful search term for any kind of redirect.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- these are just a specific instance of Pictograms but, since the article is just a thinly disguised advertisement, there is nothing to merge there. Reyk YO! 12:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above delete !votes, there's  nothing worth keeping. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no content that needs to be preserved. Information sign, the most plausible generalization of this topic could use some work. To redirect Pictorial push pull signs for doors to Information sign makes no sense because Pictorial push pull signs for doors is a highly implausible search term. There's a lot to say about the intersection of human factors engineering and design, but this isn't the place for it. Vexations (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.