Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PictureTalk (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

PictureTalk
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nominating on behalf of User:GaryECampbell. It's currently unsourced and demonstrates no notability. Looking through google hits, I cannot see any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, so I don't think it meets notability guidelines and should be deleted. I am willing to change my mind if notability can be demonstrated. Beloved Freak  18:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. "I am willing to change my mind if notability can be demonstrated."- Belovedfreak 76.179.164.79 (talk) 05:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Beloved  Freak  19:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - could not find any reliable third-party sources to back up notability. The content of the stub is extremely short so it's not obviously an advertisement, but without any sources I don't see why this article should stay.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article has existed since February, they've had sufficient time to improve it, the primary editors of the article have spamed all competing vendor and web conferencing articles to link to their company page. Though spamming is an unrelated matter, dubious activity and no effort to improve their article over a 5 month period shows the objective of their article is solely for advertising. Please note I may be in a WP:COI as I am involved in this marketplace.  I am also an expert in web conferencing.  Had they not spammed every single topic related to web conferencing and other  vendor articles (to link to their company article), I would not be involved.  GaryECampbell (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - This article was previously voted upon and deleted in 2005 - See 2005 results - GaryECampbell (talk) 19:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Doesn't assert or show notability. One source, the company webpage. Created by a WP:SPA, see Special:Contributions/Venant. Faradayplank (talk) 05:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Request speedy under G4. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  20:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Do these help establish notability? Non-press release articles (I think) and awards it won (all from 2002-2003 though).      207.34.229.126 (talk) 20:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.