Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Picture This! Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Picture This! Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a film distribution company, "referenced" only to its own (deadlinked) primary source content about itself with no evidence of reliable source coverage shown at all. But simply existing is not an automatic notability freebie for a company; an article has to be reliably sourced to enough media coverage to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Bearcat (talk) 23:32, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  02:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  02:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete A list of links to non-notable fil≤ms is not appropriate as a article space page. BrxBrx(talk)(please reply with { {re 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Defunct, non notable company. There's is no sufficient sources to demonstrate Notability in my search and neither in the article. It is clear they were never notable at all.–Ammarpad (talk) 14:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 14:24, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable company which fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Donald1659 (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.