Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pied Piper Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 23:29, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Pied Piper Records

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable label and non-notable musician:

Label fails WP:CORP with no sources, Musician is full of fail. Both read like PR. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Karl Morgan - I prodded this but its bundled into this AfD so the prod was removed. Reason still stands though, "Nothing to indicate WP:MUSIC, written like WP:SPAM, no WP:RS in the article or from google. Most of the article is rewritten from here". As for Pied Piper Records, the article was created by Eager77 who looks connected to the label, and the only other content contributor is User:OnlinePPR which is a company username for Pied Piper Records. Matty (talk) 00:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing indicates label is responsible for any notable releases.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to choose Australia's next top model ) 07:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Grahame (talk) 06:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability per WP:CORP.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 13:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.