Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pieface (The Buzz on Maggie episode)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No information to merge into List of The Buzz on Maggie episodes, so Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 03:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Pieface (The Buzz on Maggie episode)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The parent TV show is not notable enough to have this level of detail. Crufty. Contested prod. MER-C 08:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Terence Ong 10:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of The Buzz on Maggie episodes per WP:NOT, which states "Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic." (Emphasis mine.) Extraordinary Machine 12:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable TV series, + per Wikipedia is Not Paper! thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is a consensus to improve articles like this, not delete them. - Peregrine Fisher 22:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Get out of the old state of mind, people. These articles suck ass, no one will ever fix them, and they only encourage people to use Wikipedia as their "OMG" fansite of useless trivia. There never was a consensus to make articles for every episode because a minority can so easily make episode articles. Then people come on to Wikipedia, see that, and assume it was a thought out decision. It's not, it's just a big mess of "OMG, others have episode articles, we should have episode articles" misconception. Why can't we end this insanity? This episode is not notable on it's own, and does not need a dedicated article. -- Ned Scott 03:07, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Just noting that I would also be fine with a merge. -- Ned Scott 03:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Extraordinary Machine and agreed with Ned Scott comments. TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 03:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge. Per Extraordinary Machine and Ned Scott. Vassyana 12:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with Peregrine Fisher, these just need to be expanded, not deleted.. Illyria05 (Talk • Contributions) 16:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.