Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierpoint Landing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. WP:SK 1. No deletion rationale. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Pierpoint Landing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

—AssassiN's Creed (talk) 02:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Care to elaborate why you think this article should be deleted? --Oakshade (talk) 04:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

This was a small but well-known amusement area until the early 1970s. If you google it you will find references to both the historic (pre-1972) Landing and to the modern establishment bearing its name, 41,200 results in total. Article is currently short (but supported with references), so let's make it better, not just robo-delete things. Gaohoyt (talk) 04:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Procedural Keep due to lack of a deletion rationale provided by nominator. Carrite (talk) 14:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep article has verifiable references, and there appears to be notability. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 22:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep No rationale for deletion has been given. Edward321 (talk) 23:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.